Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
BMC Medical Imaging · October 21, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Abstract Background PSMA PET/CT plays an important role in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR-PCa). In general, PET/CT is performed as a limited or true whole-body examination. The majority of PET/CT scanners operate by measuring several bed positions or continuous motion with a limited axial field of view (FOV). Shortening the scan area thus results in a time saving, with unknown information loss regarding the detection of tumor manifestations. Methodology This retrospective single-center study included 200 patients with BCR-PCa after initial curative therapy who underwent a 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT scan from vertex to toe (true whole-body). Using retrospective subdivision into hypothetical partial body measurement protocols, the undetected tumor manifestations were examined. Classic PET/CT protocols were used: vertex to mid-thigh, skull base to mid-thigh, as well as CT-equivalent examination areas: chest/abdomen/pelvis (CAP), abdomen/pelvis (AP) and pelvis. Results Of 200 patients with a median PSA of 1.1 ng/mL, 128 (64%) showed at least one structural correlate of BCR-PCa in the true whole-body scan. The overall detection rate did not change for limited classic PET-protocols, or CAP measurements. CAP scans would not have detected all tumor manifestations in 16 patients (8%) and not all tumor-affected organ systems in six patients (3%), AP scans in 41 patients (21%) and 18 patients (9%), pelvic scans in 61 patients (31%) and 37 patients (19%), respectively. PSA may contribute to the prospective restriction of the scan area. Patients with PSA ≤ 0.75 ng/mL showed no diagnostic gain from whole-body imaging. This means that in 45% of patients in our cohort, a limitation to CAP scan would have been possible without losing information. Conclusions For a resource-saving use of routine PSMA-PET/CT, a scan from the vertex to the mid-thigh seems sufficient for detecting relevant metastases. For patients with low PSA levels, a more focused protocol that includes only the CAP region can be considered.