Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 8, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Detecting intra-operative speech impairment during awake craniotomy is essential for preserving language function. However, automated detection remains challenging because operating-room recordings contain substantial acoustic interference, clinically relevant speech events are rare, and available cohorts are small and heterogeneous across speakers. This study presents a systematic component-wise evaluation of a pipeline for distinguishing dysarthric from no-trouble speech in the DATABRASE corpus of awake-craniotomy recordings. The pipeline incorporates speaker diarization to isolate patient speech, a multi-view representation combining handcrafted acoustic descriptors with multilayer wav2vec 2.0 embeddings, speaker-conditional normalization and transferability-based feature selection to improve cross-speaker robustness, and a cascaded classifier comprising a gradient-boosted first stage and a neural second stage. Evaluation was conducted under strict speaker-independent conditions using leave-one-speaker-out cross-validation. The results show that cross-speaker performance is influenced more strongly by the speech representation than by classifier choice. The AUCs of three classifiers differed by no more than 4.7%, whereas replacing conventional acoustic descriptors with the multilayer self-supervised representation produced AUC improvements of 18.2%-26.1%. Diarization-conditioned feature extraction and the proposed classifier cascade provided additional consistent gains. These findings indicate that reliable patient-specific speech isolation and strong pretrained representations are more important than increased classifier complexity in low-resource intra-operative settings. They also quantify the potential performance gains that may be achieved through patient-specific preoperative calibration.