Life sciences · Journal article
Biomedicines · September 17, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Background: The demographic crisis observed in industrialized countries has been accompanied by a decline in the reproductive potential of human populations. One of the causes for the global deterioration in men’s reproductive health is adiposity and sedentary lifestyle, leading to reduced fertility and a decrease in androgen status. The aim of the study was to assess the association between abdominal obesity and semen parameters, including sperm DNA fragmentation, as well as key indicators of hormonal and metabolic status in young men from the general population. Methods: Our cross-sectional study was conducted among Russian and Belarusian men living in six cities. The examination of men (n = 1283, median age 23 years) included questionnaires, anthropometry, and the collection of peripheral blood and semen samples. Semen analysis was conducted according to WHO guidelines. Sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) was evaluated using the SCSA method. The serum and seminal zinc concentration was determined using spectrophotometry and direct calorimetry. Hormonal and metabolic levels were measured using commercial kits. Waist circumference (WC) was used as a surrogate marker of abdominal adiposity. Participants were allocated to three phenotypes: non-obese (control, WC < 94 cm), excess abdominal fat (94 ≤ WC < 102 cm) and abdominal obesity (WC ≥ 102 cm). Results: In our study population, 85.8% of participants were young (under 30 years of age), 8.6% had excess abdominal fat, 5.7% had abdominal obesity (AO), and 65.2% had normozoospermia. Men with AO were characterized by a decrease in semen volume, total sperm count, sperm concentration and progressive motility compared to the non-obese control. DFI was significantly higher in obese compared to non-obese men. Obese participants had significantly lower testosterone and inhibin B levels, but higher FSH and leptin levels compared to non-obese men. Men with AO had elevated serum zinc levels but reduced seminal zinc content. Abdominal obesity was also associated with significant metabolic changes, in particular, with increased levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol, low-density lipoproteins, fasting glucose and uric acid. AO-related testosterone deficiency (serum testosterone level ≤ 12.1 nmol/L) was detected in 38.7% of obese men and was accompanied by elevated DFI, levels of FSH, and zinc, as well as unfavorable changes in metabolic indicators. Physically active AO men (who engaged in recreational sports or physical labor) demonstrated reduced anthropometric indicators of AO and leptin levels, increased LH and testosterone levels, and improved carbohydrate and lipid metabolism compared to sedentary AO men. Conclusions: AO is accompanied by a decrease in the activity of Leydig and Sertoli cells, as well as an imbalance of the hypothalamic–pituitary–testicular axis and metabolic status. AO, associated with testosterone deficiency or a sedentary lifestyle, is a potential risk factor for the weakening of male reproductive health. However, physically active stout men showed more favorable anthropometric, hormonal, and metabolic indicators compared with sedentary stout men. In the long term, obese men who ignore a correction of sedentary lifestyle are not protected from a decline in reproductive health.