Life sciences · Journal article
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · October 13, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Introduction Cervical cancer remains a significant global health challenge. This narrative review synthesizes evidence from PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov (January 2010 to August 2026), focusing on randomized prospective trials of systemic combination therapies.Areas covered In locally advanced cervical cancer, pivotal phase 3 trials such as INTERLACE (induction chemotherapy) and KEYNOTE-A18 (pembrolizumab plus chemoradiation) have shown improved survival. For advanced, persistent, recurrent, or metastatic disease, adding pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-826) or atezolizumab (BEATcc) to chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab, has increased median overall survival from 26 to over 37 months. In the second-line setting, tisotumab vedotin (innovaTV 301) has become a new Category 1 standard. Emerging strategies include neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy to downstage isolated pelvic recurrences for extended resection (LEER), regional dual-checkpoint blockade (cadonilimab), TROP2-directed antibody-drug conjugates (sacituzumab tirumotecan), and therapeutic vaccines.Expert opinion Immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates have improved survival; however, high costs limit access, especially in low- and middle-income countries where disease burden is greatest. Key priorities include harmonizing predictive biomarkers, managing overlapping toxicities, and designing resource-conscious cooperative trials to evaluate shorter or lower-dose maintenance regimens. Addressing access disparities while refining patient selection is essential to achieving equitable global care.