Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 23, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Long-term environmental IoT/LPWAN deployments often aggregate heterogeneous data streams from diverse devices without systematic auditing of each variable's actual coverage prior to analysis-an increased risk when multiple sensor types coexist within the same network. This work proposes a C++17 processing pipeline applied to the Tour Perret LoRaWAN dataset (421 937 frames, June 2021--June 2023, 5 devices). A systematic coverage audit integrated into the extraction phase reveals that CO2 is completely missing (0% coverage) and pressure is reported only by an isolated base module (Wyres, 4.24% of the corpus), invalidating the initial hypothesis of a joint four-variable analysis. The analysis is refocused on the Temperature--Humidity pair, jointly available across 205{,}005 frames (95.76%) from 4 Elsys EMS sensors. The pipeline sequentially performs anomaly detection (modified Z-score, Isolation Forest), bivariate Principal Component Analysis, clustering (K-means, DBSCAN), and a multilayer perceptron predicting humidity from temperature and time, whose residuals serve as a detector for slow drift. On real-world data: Temperature--Humidity correlation r=-0.662, two-component PCA (PC1 =83.1% of variance), Isolation Forest detects 2.12% multivariate anomalies while univariate Z-score detects none, calibrated DBSCAN isolates 0.17% noise across 13 clusters, and the MLP achieves $R^2=0.672$ (RMSE =10.54%) in cross-validation. This work demonstrates that per-variable coverage auditing prior to modeling is a necessary methodological step for heterogeneous multi-sensor IoT datasets.