Loading
Life sciences · Phase 3 Trial
ClinicalTrials.gov · October 26, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Phase 3 Trial.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07052084). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille. Recruitment status: RECRUITING. Phase: PHASE3. Study type: INTERVENTIONAL. Enrollment: 120 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Septic Shock. Interventions: DRUG: Vasopressin administration; DRUG: Sodium chloride administration. Primary outcome measures: SOFA score comparison between the two groups , 48 hours after administration of experimental drug (H48). Brief summary: Septic shock is a syndrome associated with severe infection and a mortality rate of approximately 45%. In line with current recommendations, norepinephrine is the first-line vasopressor used in patients with septic shock. In a previous study, norepinephrine doses above 1 µg/kg/min were associated with mortality rates over 90%. In the same study, doses above 0.3 µg/kg/min were associated with a mortality rate of 40%. An increased mortality compared to the general 40% mortality of septic shock appears to be associated with norepinephrine doses as low as 0.3 µg/kg/min. Vasopressin stimulates V1 receptors, primarily located on vascular smooth muscle cells. When V1a receptors are stimulated, they induce vasoconstriction by activating protein kinase C via a Gq protein and various second messengers. Its use is validated in refractory shock states by international guidelines as a second-line vasopressor. This indication was further reinforced in the 2021 update of the septic shock management recommendations. The VASST study, a randomized controlled trial, assessed the effects of vasopressin versus norepinephrine in septic shock. It found no overall difference in mortality between the two groups. However, in less severe cases where norepinephrine doses were below 14 µg/min before randomization, vasopressin was associated with significantly lower mortality, suggesting potential benefits from early introduction of a second vasopressor. The VANISH trial failed to confirm this hypothesis, possibly due to broad inclusion criteria and unclear protocol regarding the combined use of both agents. Our hypothesis is that (1) vasopressin is beneficial when used synergistically with norepinephrine; (2) due to its negative effect on cardiac output (as shown in previous studies), vasopressin should only be administered to patients in the hyperdynamic phase of septic shock. The hypothesis is that the systematic addition of vasopressin to norepinephrine therapy in a hyperdynamic septic shock subpopulation would improve patient outcomes.