Life sciences · Journal article
Journal of Coloproctology · November 4, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Abstract Major pelvic excision, including extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) and total pelvic exenteration (TPE), creates a substantial perineal defect at high risk for empty pelvis syndrome. To evaluate the feasibility and early outcomes of an autologous, donor-site-free reconstructive technique: the pedicled colonic mucosectomy flap (CMF). A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted on 5 consecutive male patients, with locally advanced rectal cancer, who underwent CMF reconstruction following ELAPE (n = 3) and TPE (n = 2). All patients received neoadjuvant therapy. Outcomes assessed included operative parameters, complications (Clavien-Dindo classification), oncological margins, and short-term sequelae. All patients achieved R0 resection. The mean operative time was 514 minutes. There were no flap-related complications. The 30-day morbidity rate was 60%, with two major (Grade 3) complications: one pelvic collection requiring percutaneous drainage and one ureteroileal anastomotic leak requiring reoperation. No perineal hernia or chronic wound issues were observed during follow-up, with a median of 4 months. The CMF is a viable and safe autologous technique for reconstructing the perineum after major pelvic excision. It effectively utilizes native tissue without donor-site morbidity and shows promise in mitigating empty pelvis complications, warranting further investigation.