Life sciences · Journal article
Neuropsychopharmacology · September 15, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Abstract Recent evidence implicates the renin angiotensin system (RAS) in various cognitive markers of depression, including dysfunctional reward processing. Yet, it remains unknown whether these effects extend to other markers implicated in depression and its treatment, such as approach-avoidance motivations that reflect innate drives to approach reward and evade harm. We sought to examine the impact of acute losartan, an angiotensin type 1 (AT 1 ) receptor blocker, on the implicit approach-avoidance of facial expressions and checkerboard controls in healthy adults. In a randomized controlled trial, N = 68 healthy adults aged 18–50 (49 F/19 M) were administered a single 50 mg dose of losartan or placebo before completing an implicit Approach Avoidance Task (AAT) at drug-peak level. On the AAT, participants responded to color-filtered facial stimuli (happy, sad, angry, or neutral) and checkerboard controls using a joystick, and were instructed to pull all gray photos and push all brown photos as quickly as possible. Compared to placebo, losartan induced a significant avoidance bias for sad faces ( p = 0.027) and reduced avoidance of angry faces at trend level ( p = 0.085). This occurred without significant group differences on blood pressure, overall reaction time, accuracy, and approach-avoidance biases for other stimuli. The response pattern associated with AT 1 receptor blockade may counteract previously observed depressive tendencies, suggesting effects possibly consistent with antidepressant treatments. Our findings further highlight the RAS as a mechanistically relevant target for psychiatry, suggesting that AT 1 receptor antagonism may have relevance for treating depression and other emotional disorders characterized by aberrant motivational biases (Clincialtrials.gov ID: NCT06624904).