Loading
Life sciences · Journal article
International Journal of Molecular Sciences · October 21, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Journal article.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Digestive neoplasms represent a major global health burden, accounting for a substantial proportion of cancer incidence and mortality. Increasing attention has been directed toward modifiable factors that may influence both the onset and progression of these malignancies. Among them, vitamin D has emerged as a potential protective factor, with deficiency frequently associated with elevated risk and unfavorable prognosis in gastrointestinal cancers. This review critically examines the current evidence regarding the role of vitamin D and its receptor (VDR) in digestive tumorigenesis. Beyond its classical function in calcium and bone homeostasis, vitamin D exerts pleiotropic effects on cellular processes fundamental to carcinogenesis, including regulation of proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, immune modulation and genomic stability. Experimental studies demonstrate that adequate vitamin D status or administration of its analogues may suppress tumor growth and enhance responsiveness to conventional therapies. Epidemiological and clinical data, however, remain inconsistent across cancer subtypes, geographic populations and methods of vitamin D assessment. The analysis underscores the need for standardized evaluation of vitamin D levels, elucidation of dose–response relationships and clarification of interactions with genetic polymorphisms and environmental exposures. Future large-scale, randomized controlled trials are essential to establish causality and to define the optimal role of vitamin D in prevention and treatment strategies. Taken together, current findings support the hypothesis that vitamin D may serve not only as a biomarker of prognosis but also as a promising adjunctive approach in the management of digestive neoplasms.