Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · November 4, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
API distillation campaigns try to hide model-stealing traffic by splitting requests across thousands of load-balanced accounts, which standard content classifiers often miss. However, request timestamps, specifically arrival time and stream completion time, reveal the underlying dispatching strategy, such as round-robin counters or key-shuffling pools. Using a 20 percent seed set, this timing analysis can forensically rank the remaining accounts of a campaign with 0.92 to 1.00 AUC within 20 minutes, even across thousands of real production accounts. While adaptive attackers struggle to hide rotating dispatchers using jitter, pinning keys successfully evades detection, though it can severely throttle throughput when quotas bind. Ultimately, timing exposes shared infrastructure patterns even when content filters fail.