Living Healthy educational program + peer coaching / Living Healthy educational program / Mental Health Issue · Interventional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov · August 20, 2026
Early or partial results. Treat as a signal, not a conclusion.
This is a planned interventional feasibility study registered to evaluate whether a behavioral mental health program ('Living Healthy') combined with peer coaching is acceptable and adherent among home health aides, compared to the program alone. No results are reported in this registry record; the study is currently recruiting. The primary endpoints are fidelity, adherence, and acceptability measures at 6 months, not clinical mental health outcomes.
Interventional, Randomized, Parallel, Single masking, Health Services Research purpose. Mental Health Issue; age from 18 Years; accepts healthy volunteers. Intervention: Living Healthy educational program + Peer Coaching. Compared with: Living Healthy educational program — Active Comparator. n = 100. 2 sites: United States.
This is a planned interventional feasibility study registered to evaluate whether a behavioral mental health program ('Living Healthy') combined with peer coaching is acceptable and adherent among home health aides, compared to the program alone. No results are reported in this registry record; the study is currently recruiting. The primary endpoints are fidelity, adherence, and acceptability measures at 6 months, not clinical mental health outcomes.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
Results from this feasibility study will inform whether the Living Healthy program plus peer coaching is acceptable and feasible to deliver to home health aides before larger efficacy trials can be conducted. Clinicians and researchers should await results to evaluate whether this intervention warrants further development for this workforce.
This is a clinical trial registry record describing a planned interventional study with no results posted; it reports design and feasibility outcomes only, representing early-phase work to test acceptability and fidelity before efficacy can be assessed.
As stated by the source record.
Quoted from the source exactly as published.
Results from this feasibility study will inform whether the Living Healthy program plus peer coaching is acceptable and feasible to deliver to home health aides before larger efficacy trials can be conducted. Clinicians and researchers should await results to evaluate whether this intervention warrants further development for this workforce.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no key findings. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Registry record from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06071221). This is a study registration, not published results. Lead sponsor: Weill Medical College of Cornell University. Recruitment status: RECRUITING. Phase: NA. Study type: INTERVENTIONAL. Enrollment: 100 participants (ESTIMATED). Conditions: Mental Health Issue. Interventions: BEHAVIORAL: Living Healthy educational program + peer coaching; BEHAVIORAL: Living Healthy educational program. Primary outcome measures: Fidelity to study protocol (intervention arm) , at 6 months post-intervention; Fidelity to study protocol (control arm) , at 6 months post-intervention; Fidelity to session completion (intervention arm) , at 6 months post-intervention; Fidelity to session completion (control arm) , at 6 months post-intervention; Fidelity to study protocol (intervention) , at 6 months post-intervention; Accrual rate , at 3 months; Refusal rate , at 3 months; Retention rate as measured by the proportion of participants who provide 6 month combined data. , at 6 month post-intervention; Adherence to the intervention , at 6 months post-intervention; Acceptability , at 6 months post-intervention. Brief summary: The goal of this study is to improve the mental health of home health aides, a workforce that provides care for adults at home but whose own health has been historically poor. The main questions the study aims to answer are: * Will a health program called Living Healthy, which provides health education and support with positive thinking, be used by home health aides and do they like it? * Does Living Healthy actually improve home health aides' mood compared to what they usually do to take care of themselves? Participants in the study will get an 8-week health program called Living Healthy over 3 months. Some of the participants will also have a 'peer coach' who is another home health aide who's been trained to help them with the program and learn some ways to feel better. The study will compare the experiences of home health aides who get Living Healthy plus a peer coach with those who only get the Living Healthy program.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.