Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · November 5, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Reinforcement learning (RL) provides a framework for continuous improvement through interaction with an environment. However, RL agents struggle against tasks that offer exploration challenges and sparse rewards, because learning efficient policies from scratch is slow and sample-inefficient. In contrast, decision models (DMs), given a description of the environment and task, can perform well in sparse-reward tasks, but, as they do not learn from reward, they are not able to improve towards the optimal solution. In this paper, we present Decision Model-Guided Training (DMGT), a technique that uses a DM with a description of the environment and task to initialise an RL policy, combining the DM's ability to act without training with RL's ability to improve from reward. Instead of exploring from scratch, the agent reaches the goal and receives reward from its first episodes, and RL then improves its policy beyond what the DM achieves. We demonstrate through experiments on seven tasks that our approach outperforms RL in all seven and DM in five. In addition, we provide comprehensive guidelines, derived from ablation studies, for describing an environment and task to a DM.