Life sciences · Journal article
Antibiotics · August 26, 2026
Raises a question worth testing. It does not answer one.
This is a narrative review of virulence and antimicrobial resistance mechanisms in Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli, integrating gene-carriage surveys, strain variation, and resistance-fitness relationships. The authors conclude that available data do not establish that antimicrobial resistance generally predicts more severe human disease, despite documented alterations in colonization or competitive fitness for specific mutations (gyrA Thr-86-Ile and CmeABC).
Narrative review. Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli; human campylobacteriosis cases in the context of One Health reservoirs (animal, food, environmental)..
Motility and adhesion have the most reproducible support during colonization and epithelial contact Biofilm formation, quorum sensing, and T6SS-associated phenotypes vary substantially across strains and models gyrA Thr-86-Ile and CmeABC can alter colonization or competitive fitness, but available data do not show that resistance generally predicts more severe human disease
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
Clinicians should recognize that antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter does not necessarily correlate with increased disease severity in humans. Surveillance and intervention priorities should be reassessed in light of the documented fitness-resistance trade-offs and ecological distribution rather than assuming resistance-virulence coupling.
A narrative review synthesizing existing knowledge on virulence mechanisms and resistance pathways in Campylobacter species; raises questions about resistance-fitness relationships but does not present new empirical evidence or a definitive causal link to human disease severity.
As stated by the source record.
Clinicians should recognize that antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter does not necessarily correlate with increased disease severity in humans. Surveillance and intervention priorities should be reassessed in light of the documented fitness-resistance trade-offs and ecological distribution rather than assuming resistance-virulence coupling.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
What is missing. This record has no reported figures. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli account for most recognized cases of human campylobacteriosis. For C. coli, gene-carriage surveys often stand in for direct tests of function; this distinction is maintained throughout the review. Virulence is discussed as a sequence of events rather than as a catalogue of factors. Motility and adhesion have the most reproducible support during colonization and epithelial contact, whereas biofilm formation, quorum sensing, and T6SS-associated phenotypes vary substantially across strains and models. We then consider host–cell injury, persistence, transmission, and the uncommon post-infectious outcomes linked to sialylated LOS. Antimicrobial resistance is treated in parallel, with emphasis on target-site change, ribosomal protection or methylation, enzymatic inactivation, and CmeABC-mediated efflux. The One Health model places both species within overlapping animal, food, and environmental reservoirs rather than assigning C. jejuni exclusively to poultry or C. coli to swine. A narrower conclusion emerges from the resistance-fitness literature: gyrA Thr-86-Ile and CmeABC can alter colonization or competitive fitness, but the available data do not show that resistance generally predicts more severe human disease. This distinction frames the proposed priorities for surveillance and intervention.
Taken from the source record, never inferred. Follow any of these and new work involving them reaches your briefing.