Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · November 2, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Convexity has three equivalent descriptions: support by affine functions, monotonicity of the subdifferential, and increasing secant slopes. We weaken all three by one distortion with parameter $γ\in(0,1]$, which multiplies positive changes by $γ$ and divides negative ones by $γ$. The resulting classes are the convex functions at $γ=1$ and, for $γ<1$, are distinct and nested, with the parameter dropping by at most a square along the chain. For proper lower semicontinuous functions in these classes, the effective domain is convex, local minimizers are global, and the function is locally Lipschitz on the relative interior of its domain. The classes separate offline from online optimization over compact convex sets with efficient projection, with access to function values and bounded support vectors. A smooth member of any class can be minimized to additive accuracy $\varepsilon$ with $\mathrm{poly}(1/\varepsilon)$ first-order queries and projections. Online, with nonpositive losses and $α$-regret measured against $α$ times the best fixed point, a polynomial-time algorithm achieves $γ$-regret $O(\sqrt T)$ on the largest class. For every fixed, effectively specified $γ\in(0,1)$ and every $α\in(γ,1]$, no randomized polynomial-time algorithm has sublinear expected $α$-regret unless $\mathbf{NP}=\mathbf{RP}$, already for smooth concave polynomial losses in the smallest class, each minimized by one linear optimization. Thus, unless $\mathbf{NP}=\mathbf{RP}$, $γ$ is the exact online coefficient of each class, while the offline coefficient is one.