Loading
Life sciences · Preprint
arXiv · October 30, 2026
No summary has been generated for this record yet. What follows is drawn from its source metadata only.
Preprint.
No findings were extractable from the material analysed.
Safety was not reported in the material analysed. Check the source before drawing any conclusion about harm.
The source did not state who this applies to in practice.
Graded across the dimensions that decide whether you should act, each from what the source actually supports. There is no single score, and where a dimension was not assessed it says so.
This record has not been graded across any dimension yet. Treat the label above as provisional and read the source.
What is missing. This record has no bottom line, key findings, reported figures, evidence dimensions. That is a gap in the analysis, not a judgement about the study.
Distribution Matching Distillation (DMD) trains a few-step student using the difference between a teacher's score and an online critic's estimate of the student distribution's score. We investigate what the critic needs, in capacity and in information, to provide a reliable training signal. On the capacity side, controlled experiments across seven SiT model sizes on ImageNet show that increasing teacher size while keeping a small critic fixed can degrade student quality and cause training collapse. Scaling the critic alongside the teacher, a strategy we call joint scaling, prevents collapse in our experiments and allows the student to benefit from larger teachers. On the information side, rather than forcing the critic to model a step-agnostic mixture of student outputs, we introduce a step-aware critic (STAC) that conditions on the student's generation step to estimate step-specific scores. Together, joint scaling and STAC consistently improve few-step distillation across class-conditional ImageNet generation, text-to-image generation with SDXL and FLUX.2, and text-to-video generation with Wan2.1.